Mike the Psych's Blog

What if psychologists ruled the world? In real life?

Now thats what you call a REAL sport……………….

Kindadukish's Blog - I am not a number, I am a free man (The Prisoner)

 A Finnish couple has narrowly won the 19th Wife Carrying World Championships — a quirky competition in which men race to be the fastest while carrying a female teammate.


Ville Parviainen and Janette Oksman cleared the grueling 253.5 meter (278-yard) obstacle course in 63.75 seconds on Saturday, less than a second ahead of Britain’s Rich Blake Smith and Anna Marguerite Smith.

Thirty-six couples from a dozen countries including Australia, Japan, and the United States took part in the race, which was held in the central Finnish municipality of Sonkajarvi, north of the capital, Helsinki.

The rules stipulate that the woman must be over 17 years of age and weigh at least 108 pounds. In years past, the winner’s were rewarded with their wife’s weight in beer.


Despite the event’s name couples don’t have to be married, and organizers say male contestants could “borrow a neighbor’s wife” if they didn’t have…

View original post 72 more words


Olympic games are good for what exactly?

You may have noticed that the government has increased the budget for the opening and closing ceremonies for the Olympic games by £40M. Not a lot in the scale of things but you’d think in these times of austerity they could do something a bit more useful.

How exactly will it benefit this country? It won’t bring in more tourists once they realise how much they’ve been ripped off going to stay in London.

And then there’s all the talk about how the games will be good for business. Well maybe in London but is it going to benefit people in Gateshead or Runcorn or Carlisle?

People living in London can’t even get tickets but if you are a corporate sponsor you will have already got your share. And don’t get me going on sponsors – MacDonald’s, that well-know healthy food outlet!

But we know it’s all about the money not the olympic ideal. Athletes don’t perform for pride in their country but in the hope of winning gold and then getting on the honours list or even a seat in the House of Lords and a couple of directorships. Lord Coe hasn’t done too badly has he? The Olympic ideal disappeared long ago when we started paying athletes to do what they enjoyed doing.

As Matthew Syed pointed out in a Times column earlier this year, there is no evidence that the investment in sports quangos running into hundreds of millions has actually increased participation levels or that sport improves self-esteem, reduces delinquency, or increases community cohesion. It may improve health but is unlikely to save the NHS any money in the long run.

At one time it was believed by economist that major sporting events could benefit the country but that hasn’t always turned out to be the case.

So let’s keep the whole thing in perspective. Most of us can’t afford to go and watch it and if we do go we know we’ll get ripped off by all and sundry like innocent tourists abroad (hotel prices are up 300% blamed partly on the fact that officials and sponsors bagged the first 50,ooo rooms).

Some athletes will do well out of it, increasing their sponsorship maybe thereby putting off the day they will need to get a proper job, having someone ghost-writing a book for them, doing personal appearances etc.

People will skive off work to watch their favourite events on TV so productivity will be down. And if we don’t win anything we’ll all be depressed. It’s hard to create a feel-good factor with the economy in the state it’s in.

Sporting cheats prosper

Football fans have got used to the cheating and wheeler dealing that goes on, particularly in the Premier League where the stakes are high. The owners know we love our football and will put up with pretty much anything as long as we can follow our teams.

A prime example was West Ham’s breach of the regulations about declaring 3rd party ownerships which enabled Tevez to play for them and arguably save them from relegation at the expense of, among others, Sheffield United.

OK, they were fined and Sheffield United won some compensation but West Ham didn’t get points deducted and stayed in the Premier League (for how much longer remains to be seen).

QPR, poised for promotion to the Premier League, may yet have points deducted by the FA for having a player owned by a 3rd party. Their manager, Neil Warnock, was manager at Sheffield United when they were relegated and he still blames West Ham for that. Seems football managers don’t do irony!

Challenges like Rooney’s recent transgression or penalties missed by the referees are manifestly unfair when players who should have been punished go on to contribute to winning a game.

(Not to mention the rules which prevent retrospective action in case it upsets the referees and managers – some of whom follow Nelson’s blind eye example and never see anything).

And in the recent Grand National Jason Maguire, rider of the winner Ballabriggs, was banned for excessive use of the whip. If he so clearly broke the rules why wasn’t he disqualified and the race awarded to the second placed horse?

Officials at Towcester race course announced their intention to ban jockeys using whips behind the saddle from October as they believe that the public think it’s cruel (especially after the Grand National). In addition Kevin Ackerman, the course’s general manager, wants to disqualify jockeys who break the rules. He says that because jockeys are racing for  hundreds of thousands of pounds a ban isn’t a deterrent.

It will probably come as no surprise that the British Horseracing Authority and the National Trainers Federation criticised the idea arguing that they can’t have different rules at different race courses and that they are already having a review. (Updated 23 April 2011)

It seems there are no penalties for these cheats who break the rules. They get away with it and reap the rewards. Hardly fair and doesn’t it leave a nasty taste in your mouth too?

Updated 26 May 2011: FIFA, FIFA & FIFA. Need I say more!

I forgot to mention Formula 1 and Bernie Ecclestone’s fiefdom the FIA. Lewis Hamilton’s MacClaren team have been hit by the “spy-gate” and “liar-gate” scandals and fined over $100m. Renault has been in trouble as well. It seems drivers readily lie, and deliberately crash into other cars – because championship points and big money are at stake.

Updated 16 June 2011: Horse racing must be the only so-called sport where you can be disqualified and still win! At Ascot yesterday Frankie Dettori flagrantly breached the rules by using his whip 24 times over 2 furlongs (if the horse was galloping at 30 mph that means he hit it 24 times in about the 30 seconds it would take to cover 1/4 mile ie 2 furlongs).

The stewards banned him for 9 days (the Grand National jockey was banned for 5  for a similar offence). Leaving aside the question of cruelty to the horse, if he broke the rules and was disqualified why did the win stand? 

Updated 26 June 2010:  Good to see one or two letters in press making same point as me about jockeys who cheat. Also yesterday a great piece by Simon Barnes, Chief Sports writer in The Times; “Changing face of cheating: a handy review”.

It’s 25 years since the “Hand of God” goal by Maradona which ended our 1986 World Cup run. But not that long ago since Thierry Henry hand-balled a goal against Ireland that saw France qualify for the World Cup finals last year.

We forget that Michael Owen dived to get a penalty against Argentina in 1998. Barnes doesn’t think Michael Owen cheated but of course he did but we probably think it was pay-back for Maradona’s goal.

Barnes covers a whole range of sports where cheating is rife. Some I’ve already mentioned but he includes missed dope tests (Rio, you know where you were, and Christine, a woman who doesn’t keep a diary?), cricket (but who cares any more when we know teams are swayed by betting syndicates), and Rugby (fake blood) and more dangerously deliberate car crashes in motor racing.

It’s worth a read to understand how our views on cheating have changed over time and how it varies from sport to sport.

We should add tennis to the list. Female tennis players who grunt when they serve do it to un-nerve their opponents and mask the impact of the ball on the racket.

Monica Seles started it but Sharapova has been recorded at 100 decibels which is way over the levels allowed in the workplace. Maybe they should do a risk assessment and provide ear muffs for spectators?

Top ranking Caroline Wozniacki has complained and said players who don’t grunt in training then do it in the match are effectively cheating.

Azarenka, the Belorussian, who has the longest drawn out one, is unrepentant and says it’s normal and no-one else’s business.

However the WTA says it will educate young players in the perils of grunting.